ICF Construction Trends in North America (2023–2025)
- TKH Construction
- May 14
- 15 min read
Updated: May 18

Insulated Concrete Forms (ICFs) – hollow foam blocks or panels that stack together and fill with concrete – are gaining traction as a high-performance building method. ICF construction is often considered a subset of prefabricated construction, since the form units are manufactured off-site and assembled like building blocks on-site. This approach streamlines construction by combining multiple steps (structure, insulation, air/vapor barrier, etc.) into one system¹. The result is an energy-efficient, disaster-resilient wall that can be erected faster with less labor than traditional methods. Below, we dive into recent trends, adoption rates, and the outlook for ICF in North America’s residential and ICI (industrial, commercial, institutional) construction sectors, backed by the latest 2023–2025 data.
ICF Construction Trends: ICF Adoption and Market Share in North America
How widely are ICF systems used? While still far from mainstream, ICF usage has grown steadily. Industry estimates suggest ICF construction now accounts for roughly 7–10% of the North American market². For example, in the United States about 7% of new single-family homes completed in 2023 were built with concrete framing (including ICF), versus 93% in wood framing³. An ICF industry expert recently noted that “debatably 10% of the market” has been captured by ICF, leaving plenty of room to grow⁴. This indicates that on the order of one in ten builders or projects are now utilizing ICFs in some capacity.
Regional differences are stark. Canada has been a hotbed for ICF adoption – in fact, Canada leads the North American ICF market with ~50% of regional market share as of 2024⁵, despite Canada having only about one-tenth the population of the U.S. This outsized adoption is driven by Canada’s push for energy-efficient construction. According to Douglas Bennion of the ICF Manufacturers Association (ICFMA), Ontario has the highest density of ICF usage in the world¹. In the Toronto region, an estimated ~3% of new homes were built with ICF around 2021¹ – a small but noteworthy share that is expected to rise as awareness grows. By contrast, the U.S. has lagged slightly in residential adoption, but is now the fastest-growing ICF market in North America (projected ~5% annual growth through 2029) as more builders and developers begin to embrace the technology⁵.
To put ICF into context of prefabrication trends: Prefabricated construction overall (including modular, panelized, and form systems like ICF) now accounts for nearly 20% of all U.S. construction projects⁵. ICF’s growth is contributing to this trend. By delivering pre-made forms that simplify on-site work, ICFs act as a gateway to prefabrication for many traditional contractors. Builders who might be hesitant to jump straight into full modular construction often find ICF an easier first step – it still involves pouring concrete on site, but much of the assembly is standardized and rapid. In this way, ICF technology is boosting overall prefab adoption by offering a hybrid approach that reduces material waste and on-site labor, two key benefits driving the prefab movement⁵¹.
Residential Construction: Growing Use of ICF Homes
Residential construction (single-family and low-rise multi-family) has been the core of the ICF market and continues to dominate usage. As of 2024, about 68.5% of all ICF construction revenue comes from the residential sector⁶ – meaning roughly two-thirds of ICF volume is going into houses, apartments, and condos. This makes sense: ICF technology was first popularized for homes, where its insulation and comfort benefits shine. In the 1990s, over 90% of ICF applications were residential (mostly foundation walls)⁷. Today, ICF is being used for entire home superstructures, not just basements – delivering stronger, quieter, and far more energy-efficient homes than wood framing.
Market penetration in housing is still emerging. In the U.S., the majority of new homes remain wood-framed, but the share built with concrete/ICF has ticked up to 7% in 2023³. In Canada, the penetration is higher in some provinces (Ontario’s ~3% noted above, and likely more in Quebec and other provinces with energy code incentives). Builders report that homebuyer interest in ICF is rising alongside greater awareness of its benefits. Energy savings are a major draw – studies by the U.S. HUD found that houses built with ICF walls achieve 20–25% annual heating and cooling cost savings compared to conventional wood-framed houses⁵. These efficiency gains help ICF homes meet strict energy codes and even net-zero targets. (Notably, Canadian provinces have agreed to adopt net-zero-energy-ready building codes by 2030⁸, which is accelerating interest in high-performance wall systems like ICF that can hit low HERS scores and high R-values).
Homeowners also appreciate the comfort and disaster-resilience of ICF homes. With dense, foam-insulated concrete walls, an ICF house excels at maintaining stable indoor temperatures and resisting storms. The thick walls provide a built-in safe room of sorts – an appealing trait in regions facing hurricanes, tornadoes, or wildfires. In disaster-prone areas of the U.S., some homeowners are choosing to build with ICF and forego expensive insurance, confident their house can withstand events that would flatten a wood structure⁴. As one ICF industry advocate put it, given the increasing risks, “Why didn’t you build with ICF??” is a question more people are asking after seeing storm destruction⁴. This resiliency angle, combined with rising lumber costs in recent years, has started to shift builder mindsets in favor of concrete forms.
Labor and cost factors have recently tilted more in favour of ICF as well. During the pandemic construction boom, lumber prices spiked dramatically (up 120–160% in 2020)⁴, narrowing the cost gap between stick-built and ICF construction. One distributor noted that “building with ICFs in our area typically costs $3–$4 more per square foot than a lumber home, so if the price of lumber goes up $5,000, then ICF is only $1,000–$3,000 more”⁴ for an average home. When factoring in the smaller HVAC systems and insurance discounts that ICF homes can garner, the lifecycle cost can break even with or beat wood frames. Meanwhile, the chronic skilled labor shortage in construction has made ICF’s labor efficiency very attractive.
A case study by LogixICF found that a crew of 8 using ICFs could build a structure in 12,000 labor hours vs. 18,000 hours with a crew of 15–20 for wood framing⁹ – roughly one-third less labor. For homebuilders struggling to find carpenters, ICF’s simpler assembly (stack blocks, brace, and pour) is a relief. These practical advantages are driving more small and midsize homebuilders to experiment with ICFs, even if only for foundations at first, then for full wall systems as they gain confidence.
Commercial and ICI Construction: ICF Moves Into the Mainstream
Historically, ICF was used sparingly in commercial, industrial, and institutional (ICI) construction – as late as the mid-1990s, less than 10% of ICF volume went into commercial projects⁷. That has changed dramatically. By the mid-2000s, about 30% of ICF usage was in commercial/ICI buildings⁷, and today roughly one-third of all ICF construction is non-residential, a share that continues to grow⁶. In North America, the commercial and institutional segments are now major drivers of ICF market growth⁵, with especially strong adoption in schools, hotels, retail, and low-rise multifamily buildings.
Why the surge in commercial interest? Many of the same benefits that appeal to homeowners – energy efficiency, speed, and resilience – are even more valuable at commercial scale. For example, ICF big-box stores, theatres, and schools can slash utility bills and maintenance costs for their owners over the building’s life. A recent standout project is The Orion at Lumino Park, an 18-story apartment tower in Calgary built entirely with ICF (the tallest ICF building in Western Canada). This 135-unit high-rise achieved Built Green Platinum certification and uses only one-fifth the energy of a traditional high-rise – an astonishing performance for a concrete structure⁴. Such examples prove that ICF can deliver not just robustness but ultra-low operating costs even in large buildings. The thick insulating forms dramatically lower HVAC loads; in the Orion’s case, the ICF envelope helped cut energy costs by over 50% compared to a typical building, savings that ultimately benefit the tenants in the form of lower utility bills⁴.

Another factor in commercial adoption is building code evolution. New energy codes in many jurisdictions require continuous insulation (CI) on commercial walls, higher R-values, and stronger windstorm resistance – all areas where ICF shines. Builders who might otherwise stick with steel or CMU are finding it simpler to meet code with ICF walls that inherently provide continuous R-23+ insulation and storm resilience in one package⁴. For instance, school districts in tornado-prone regions have started opting for ICF construction to create inherently hardened facilities (sometimes even doubling as community storm shelters). Anecdotally, some hotel chains have now adopted 100% ICF for all new builds after successful trials, citing the combination of speed and performance⁴.
The momentum in ICI is evidenced by contractor activity. Bid requests for commercial ICF projects have jumped markedly in the past 1–2 years. Randy Daniels of Fox Blocks (an ICF manufacturer) noted in late 2023 that he personally bid 200+ commercial jobs in 2023, up from 150 the year before – including over 90 school projects in Texas alone⁴. “As soon as a school district sees that the cost of ICF isn’t any different [than traditional], and they can get mass walls with 5 inches of insulation for the same price, they are on board,” Daniels explains⁴. In other words, awareness has reached a tipping point in some commercial niches: decision-makers are realizing ICF can deliver code-compliant, highly insulated walls at comparable up-front cost to less efficient methods. The return on investment (ROI) calculus – factoring in energy savings, disaster durability, and even marketing appeal of a “green” building – often tips in favor of ICF for forward-thinking owners⁴.
Key commercial/ICI segments adopting ICF today include:
Education and Civic Buildings: Schools, universities, fire stations, and municipal buildings seeking long-term resilience and low operating costs. (North Texas, for example, saw a wave of school designs switching to ICF in 2023⁴.)
Hospitality: Hotels, especially in hurricane or seismic zones, where ICF’s strength and soundproofing improve guest safety and comfort. Entire hotel chains are moving to ICF structural walls as a standard⁴.
Multifamily Residential: Mid-rise apartments and condos (up to ~6–8 stories typically, though the Calgary project shows even taller is possible). Developers use ICF to achieve energy certifications and attract sustainability-conscious renters.
Retail and Industrial: Big-box retail stores, wineries, warehouses, and even specialized uses like climate-controlled agricultural storage. An ICF-built potato storage facility in Idaho, for instance, virtually eliminated crop spoilage by keeping interior temperatures constant year-round⁴.
In short, ICF has expanded well beyond single-family housing and is increasingly common in commercial and institutional builds that prioritize efficiency and resilience. The share of ICF usage in these sectors (roughly one-third of the market) is expected to grow, gradually eating into the dominance of steel, masonry, and tilt-up construction for low- to mid-rise structures.
How ICF Accelerates Prefabrication Adoption
ICF’s rise is intertwined with the broader prefabrication and off-site construction movement. Prefab methods are on the rise – the North American prefab building market is growing ~6% annually and is expected to reach ~$68 billion by 2030⁵. Within that, ICF plays a unique role by bridging traditional and prefab practices:
Factory-Fabricated Components: ICF blocks/panels are manufactured in factories with precision molds. This ensures uniform quality and reduces on-site waste. By arriving ready to stack, ICF forms bring some factory efficiency to what is otherwise on-site concrete work.
One-Step Assembly: As noted, an ICF wall combines framing, insulation, and air barrier in one system¹. This eliminates the need for separate crews to frame walls, install fiberglass baths, apply house-wrap, sheathing, etc. Fewer trades and passes are needed on site, which is a core goal of prefabrication. In essence, ICF is a prefab wall system where the “panels” stay in place as part of the finished structure.
All-Weather Construction: Similar to modular construction, using ICF can mitigate weather delays. The foam forms protect the concrete cure and allow builders to work in colder conditions that would stall wood framing. This reliability is another reason prefab construction is gaining favor in climates with harsh winters⁵ – and ICF is being used in exactly those settings (e.g. Canadian winters) to keep projects on schedule.
Waste Reduction: Prefabrication aims to cut waste, and ICF contributes by reducing material waste on site. Builders can cut ICF blocks to fit, and even scraps as small as 6 inches can be used elsewhere in the wall⁴, something impossible with lumber. This efficiency is eco-friendly and cost-saving, aligning with sustainable construction trends.
It’s important to note that ICF is compatible with other prefab elements too. Many hybrid projects use ICF for foundations and lower walls, then panelized or modular components above. ICF also pairs well with pre-manufactured truss and floor systems. In summary, ICF is helping drive prefab adoption by offering a semi-prefab solution that any contractor can adopt with minimal retraining – a significant point of entry into off-site methods for the broader industry.
Industry Drivers Behind ICF Growth (2023–2025)
Several strong tailwinds are propelling the increased use of insulated concrete forms in North America:
Energy Efficiency & Green Building: Heightened focus on energy codes, green certifications (LEED, Passive House, etc.), and long-term energy savings makes ICF very attractive. An ICF wall provides continuous insulation (often rated ~R-23 or higher) and airtightness that easily exceeds most energy code baselines¹. As utility costs rise and codes mandate better performance, builders are turning to ICF to future-proof projects. For instance, many areas now require adding continuous exterior insulation on wood-framed walls – but an ICF wall inherently meets this requirement without extra labor⁴. Government and utility incentives for high-efficiency buildings are further sweetening the deal. All these factors position ICF as a straightforward way to achieve low HERS scores and even net-zero-ready construction⁵⁸.
Resilience to Disasters and Climate: North America has seen more intense storms, wildfires, and climate stresses in recent years, and this is influencing construction choices. ICF construction offers superior resistance to hurricanes, tornadoes, fires, and floods – the steel-reinforced concrete core creates a disaster-resistant shell. This durability is increasingly valued by property owners, insurers, and even building codes (some jurisdictions offer code credits or lower insurance premiums for wind- or fire-rated concrete walls). High-profile disasters have served as wake-up calls; each hurricane or wildfire season tends to spur a flurry of inquiries about ICF as people rebuild or fortify homes⁴. The narrative of “build it once, build it to last” aligns well with ICF’s promise. As one example, Florida builders report more clients willing to invest in ICF after recent hurricane damage, aiming to create homes that can survive with minor repairs instead of total losses. Resilience has become a major selling point – and even a moral imperative for some builders advocating safer construction.
Labor Shortages & Productivity: The construction labor crunch across the U.S. and Canada (where ~62% of contractors report labor shortages⁹) is pushing firms toward methods that require fewer skilled workers. ICF fits the bill: it’s relatively simple to learn (often likened to “adult LEGO blocks”), and one crew can do work that would otherwise require several trades. The reduced man-hours and smaller crew sizes needed for ICF construction have been demonstrated in practice – e.g. completing a building with 8 ICF crew members vs. 15+ carpenters for wood⁹. For contractors struggling to staff projects, ICF allows them to maintain output with less labor. Additionally, many younger workers are drawn to the technology aspect of ICF and the cleaner, less physically punishing work compared to traditional framing (no heavy lumber to lug or nail). The ICF industry and trade groups have capitalized on this by ramping up training programs in trade schools and offering on-site training for crews⁴. The easier it becomes to get a team ICF-proficient, the more contractors will adopt it to alleviate labor woes.
Material Cost Stability: Volatile lumber prices and material supply chain issues in 2020–2022 made builders painfully aware of the risk of relying solely on wood. ICF materials (foam and concrete) have had their own price fluctuations, but generally concrete costs are more stable relative to lumber’s swings. The price-spike in lumber in 2021–2022, which added tens of thousands to the cost of a wood-framed house, prompted many builders to give ICF a fresh look⁴. Even though lumber prices have since moderated, the lesson remains: diversifying building systems can hedge against future price shocks. Some builders now offer an ICF option to clients as a way to ensure cost certainty if lumber spikes again. Moreover, the growing number of ICF manufacturers and competition (over a dozen major brands in North America) is expected to drive ICF material prices down in the long term¹, improving the cost competitiveness further.
Owner/Buyer Demand and Marketing: Finally, a softer but important driver is that consumers are increasingly asking for ICF or similar high-performance features in their projects. Homebuyers who prioritize sustainability or have experienced storm losses are doing their own research and requesting ICF construction from builders. Likewise, commercial developers seeking a market edge (e.g. an apartment building that promises lower utility bills and superior comfort) use ICF as a selling point. End-user awareness is still in early stages, but it’s growing thanks to exposure on home improvement TV shows, YouTube, and word-of-mouth from successful projects⁴. Builders note that having an ICF model home or case study can help attract clients who want “the latest and greatest” in durable, efficient construction. Essentially, ICF is getting a reputation as a premium, 21st-century building method – part of the broader trend of innovation in construction that also includes smart homes, solar roofs, and modular builds.
Future Outlook for ICF in North America
Looking ahead, the outlook for insulated concrete forms in both the residential and ICI segments is decidedly optimistic. Current forecasts project steady growth for the ICF market through the rest of the decade. North America is expected to maintain its lead as the largest regional market for ICF, with analysts predicting around 5–7% annual growth (CAGR) in ICF demand in coming years⁵. Globally, the ICF market is on track to nearly double from about ~$950 million in 2024 to ~$1.8–2.0 billion by the mid-2030s⁵. In North America, some reports peg the market size around $1.2 billion in 2024 and climbing to several billion by the early 2030s⁶. While these figures are still a fraction of the overall construction industry, they represent a healthy expansion for a construction method that two decades ago was considered niche.
Residential sector: In homebuilding, ICF is poised for broader adoption as energy codes ratchet up. By 2025, the 2021 International Energy Conservation Code (IECC) will be in effect in many states, likely boosting the use of continuous insulation solutions. By 2030, Canada’s net-zero-ready code will virtually necessitate methods like ICF for many builds⁸. We can expect the market share of ICF in new homes to continue rising, possibly into double digits percentage-wise over the next 5–10 years. If wood framing’s share indeed dips below the current ~93% of U.S. new homes, ICF will likely be a primary beneficiary (along with structural insulated panels and other systems)³. The big opportunity is in production homebuilding – if even a few large tract builders start offering ICF options or standardize on ICF for energy-efficient product lines, the volume could increase substantially. The introduction of more cost-competitive ICF products and integration with design software (BIM tools that make ICF detailing easier) will also smooth the path for residential architects and builders. In addition, retrofit applications of ICF (like ICF-based envelope upgrades for existing homes) could emerge, though new construction will dominate.
Commercial/ICI sector: Commercial growth might accelerate even faster. Industry insiders see large-scale projects “templated” for ICF on the horizon – meaning repeating designs such as chain hotels, big-box stores, or even entire subdivisions built with ICF once a prototype is proven⁴. There is buzz that more “ICF mega-projects” are coming: for example, a major tech company or institution choosing ICF for a campus of buildings to meet aggressive sustainability goals. If one Fortune 500 company builds flagship facilities with ICF and publicizes the outcomes, it could spur copycats. Manufacturers are expanding capacity in preparation for higher demand⁴; new ICF production plants have been opening across the U.S. and Canada in the past 1-2 years, shortening lead times and lowering freight costs for projects. This suggests confidence in continued growth. The commercial adoption will also be boosted by the demonstrated success of recent projects – every time an 8-story ICF hotel or a school wins accolades for cost and performance, it nudges more developers to consider ICF. Some prognosticators even foresee insurance and policy changes that favor ICF: for instance, stricter building codes in hurricane zones (making concrete or ICF practically required), or insurers offering significant premium discounts for ICF buildings due to their reduced risk profile.
In both sectors, a key theme for the future is template and repeatability. As one expert noted, “projects of scale [will be] templated” and entire development companies will adopt ICF for production-style building⁴. This hints that ICF could move from custom one-off usage into mass deployment. If/when that happens, we may see an inflection point in market share. The industry reaching a modest 10% share of the overall market (the “debatably 10%” today) could quickly snowball as remaining skeptics get on board once critical mass is achieved. From there, 20% or more of the market using ICF by the 2030s is not unrealistic, especially as part of the broader prefab revolution in construction.
Challenges do remain. ICF, being concrete-based, is not as low-carbon as wood – the cement industry’s emissions are under scrutiny, so the ICF industry will need to incorporate greener concrete mixes (e.g. supplementary cementitious materials or carbon capture) to align with climate goals. Additionally, many contractors still need education and experience to be comfortable with ICF. However, given the concerted outreach by ICF manufacturers and organizations (ICFMA, PCA, etc.), knowledge barriers are falling. Building codes and architects are now familiar with ICF design as well, making it easier to specify in projects.
In conclusion, ICF construction in North America is on an upward trajectory heading into 2025 and beyond. About 1 out of 10 builders now utilizes ICF, and the system’s share of the construction market is steadily expanding⁴. As a subset of prefabricated construction, ICF brings together the best of off-site efficiency and on-site strength, contributing significantly to the prefab trend and the future of high-performance building. With strong drivers like energy efficiency, resiliency, and labor savings, ICF is expected to play an ever-larger role in both homes and commercial buildings. Don’t be surprised if your next school, store, or even your own house is built with interlocking foam blocks and concrete – building blocks that are shaping the future of North American construction.
Sources
Sexton Group & ICF Manufacturers Association (ICFMA) – ICF benefits and labor findings.
LinkedIn & IEF Magazine – ICF market share insights (2024).
LinkedIn – Framing method statistics (2023).
ICF Builder Magazine (2021–2025 features) – Real-world case studies and trends.
Mordor Intelligence – North America Insulated Concrete Form Market Overview (2024).
Vantage Market Research – Global ICF Market Highlights (2024).
For Construction Pros– ICF Industry Report.
Efficiency Canada – Net-Zero Energy Ready Codes by 2030 Agreement.
LogixICF & ICFMA – Labor efficiency findings.
SkyQuest Technology Consulting – ICF market size projections.
Comments